brassmonkey001
New member
It might have been answered elsewhere but I haven't seen it yet.
What exactly constitutes a camouflage pattern that breaches rule 307?
Does it only apply to military style DPMs? What about urban camo e.g. grey or blue or even pink?
What about these realtree patterns?
My son has a pair of shorts that are grey and black which at a glance looks like a camo pattern but on closer inspection they are actually lots of different shaped fish. Would this fall foul of rule 307?
Surely anything that has a pattern of contrasting colours has potential as a DPM so where do GNAS draw the line, or is it purely based on the judges discretion?
What exactly constitutes a camouflage pattern that breaches rule 307?
Does it only apply to military style DPMs? What about urban camo e.g. grey or blue or even pink?
What about these realtree patterns?
My son has a pair of shorts that are grey and black which at a glance looks like a camo pattern but on closer inspection they are actually lots of different shaped fish. Would this fall foul of rule 307?
Surely anything that has a pattern of contrasting colours has potential as a DPM so where do GNAS draw the line, or is it purely based on the judges discretion?