The handicap method would be better, but for those who haven't yet shot for a handicap; and for those who don't have the tables around at the time of the shoot, it means a result can be had as soon as they finish shooting.
I agree. First let them shoot. Sort out the allowances as and when.I have no idea what form of handicap allowances the host club applied for these archers scores to be rationalised against other junior recurves but I know I would rather see them competing with a release than not being involved in archery at all.
I agree. First let them shoot. Sort out the allowances as and when.I have no idea what form of handicap allowances the host club applied for these archers scores to be rationalised against other junior recurves but I know I would rather see them competing with a release than not being involved in archery at all.
This is the best answer I've seen.No one is stopping anyone doing anything!
Shoot whatever you like...
Who cares what class it is put in?
It is about participation and competing against yourself....
enough already!
Del
I wish to neither criticise you comments or get into an argument about them.There is a minor drawback in what you say Phil;
whilst finger position isn't critical the use of releases and lenses on bows that do not under the conventional 'rules' permit such devices does have an impact if it allows the archer to achieve scores higher than those they might be expected to reach using 'standard' equipment. The same goes for arrows, a carbon-aluminium is a big advantage over a wooden shaft.
If they are not seeking to submit any stores for classification status or maybe club records then fine but if they do wish to do so they may gain an unfair advantage.
Your time/your gear is fine to a point.
Karl