It has been my experience that cable servicing does not need doing often enough to make that feature worth a great deal of consideration.
This depends.
On a
PSE Ferocity, I could change/install the peep without bow press. This is a short-limb bow, and just winding the limbs down 10 turns (in case of this bow) slacked the string enough. For a Infinite Edge, I had built an ad hoc bow press. This gets real tricky with beyond-parallel limbs.
I appreciate this feature, saving me from a 100 miles drive to the next pro shop, and the associated costs.
As for the A to A, the difference between 31 plus large cams and 34 is hardly noticeable.
I do. I tried a 35" bow, and it made a noticeable difference for me.
Then there is the rotating module draw length adjustment on the
Bowtech, much better that the three separate cams to cover the draw length.
Thats true, BT covers the whole range with one module. Albeit I would get along with the EZ 1 cam.
On the plus side, the Shadow Pro cam featues an adjustable letoff. As a counterexample, I didn't like the 75% letoff of the Infinite Edge in combination with the rather short valley.
As said, I'm not fixated on Win&Win, and the Carbon Icon is on my list.
But curiously, the YT presence of the Carbon Icon is about as small as that of the Shadow Pro (skipping obvious sales pitches).
What I realized: W&W is scarcely present in the European
compound market segment, their main focus seems olympic
recurve.
OTOH, some dealers I spoke with seem to have a beef with BT. Perhaps a left-over from the limb failure issue, I didn't enquire at that time.