Just for a change I'm going to give a specific recommendation based on my experience. And the winner is---2006
Hoyt Protec or later Proelite with XT3000 limbs and cam 1/2.
Actually this would be a bad bow for someone under 29" in draw length where the XT2000 would be better suited. This recommendation may also be far too heavy for most people.
Also having shot most Hoyts I would say that the UltraElite is a far better bow.
(I owned 4 Protecs before getting an UltraElite. My scores thanked me)
Others may (will) disagree but in my opinion if you go with either of these bows for marked distance target shooting you WILL NOT come unstuck.
They will if the bow is too heavy for them, or they do not know how to make
Hoyt's cam work for them.
The variable draw cam will take care of draw length issues and there are 65% and 75% modules to play with.
Agreed.
I was told by one well known dealer that there is no such thing as a target Bowtech, they are designed as hunting/3D bows. Fortunately no one knows where I live or the Bowtech boys would be calling with the lead piping.
Regards
Sadly the dealer is mistaken. The Bowtech Constitution is their target spec bow. They also consider the Commander as a target bow.
However Bowtech are also smart enough to know that target can be shot very well with most of their range, evidence by the events won and scores shot with their gear. Most notables being Peter Elzinga's 1410 with WR 357 at 50m, Doris Jones' Vegas win in 2006 and Stephen Clifton and Erika Anear winning the Australian Nationals in 2006 both with Allegiances.
I think because of the lower holding weight such grips are not uncomfortable,
Compound grips are thinner because a
compound is very sensitive to sideways torque. A
recurve is not. So making your compound grip wider is a bad idea.
My recommendation for a compound is
Hoyt Cam 1/2 or a 2006 or later Bowtech (with modules)
If draw is above 28" then an axle length 38" or higher.
Narrow grip
After that whichever one you like the look of best.